Gandhi 10/02/2010
Happy Birthday Mr. Gandhi! On this day in 1869 the great peaceful protester, liberator and philosopher was born. May his words ring true throughout the ages. "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi "All compromise is based on give and take, but there can be no give and take on fundamentals. Any compromise on mere fundamentals is a surrender. For it is all give and no take." - Gandhi Add Comment Burning Holy Books?! 09/07/2010
I've just learned of the Christian priest who is holding a Burn the Quran day on 9/11. What a genius this Christian must be! As a raised Christian, myself (in the US), I am offended by this whole notion. The right/white Reverend Terry Jones wishes to invoke the infamous NAZI imagery of book burning, ignorance over understanding, and many Christians have been sending him copies of the holy Islamic text to use as kindling on the painful date of the terrorist attacks on the US. Here's the kicker folks: these Christians fight loudly to offend and demonize the extremist fundamentalist Muslims who take various passages of the Islamic holy book and literalize them in order to justify battling, murdering and preaching against Western culture, Judaism and Christianity; but these Christians are loudly proving that they themselves are ignorant fundamentalists who use the Bible as their tool to condemn everyone that is not God's "chosen people" and proclaim them as sinners who are going to Hell, and therefore, have the "god-given" right to burn another people's holy book in order to provoke/offend the scapegoats of Western culture, the Muslims (including the majority who, unlike the bulk of Christians, are NOT fundamentalist egotists - does anyone remember Mohammad Ali who was stripped of his Title because he would not fight and kill, because of the vows of peace he took from the Quran?). Here's a question, utilizing the ability to empathize: how would we, the Christians, feel if our holy Bible was being used as fuel for a Nazi-like bonfire? Would we become offended and violent? I wonder... I think that religion, including Christianity, can provide very good things for good people. HOWEVER, just because this is true does not give anyone the right to judge and condemn others because of a difference in Faith. I find it hard to believe that Jesus Christ would have simply told St. Peter: "Listen, only Catholics get in this gate...you understand, Pete?" There are different strokes for different folks, and that is the way God made all of us. Before attacking others look in the mirror and make damn sure that you are not attacking the very thing that resides in yourself. This book-burning-ignorant mentality, that Christianity preaches right along with other ignorant sects of other Faiths, causes more violence and death than does Cancer and AIDs. Think on it. Discuss! Bob Dylan Sings For Haiti Benefit 08/21/2010
Bob Dylan, an advocate of equal rights for nigh on fifty years, has released a new remix of his song, "A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall," for the "Rhythms Del Mundo: Revival" album. The proceeds go to benefit those in need in Haiti. See more about it on his site here. One of the greatest songwriters/writers of the 20-21st centuries, and possibly of all time, Bob has continued to fight to help people in need around the globe. He sets an example for us all. Philosophically, the measure of a human cannot be proved visible unless our actions to aid family, friends and strangers (though none of us are really that different to be considered "strangers") alike, shine blindingly bright. Live like the setting sun, and do all that you can. Help yourself, help others, help the world at large that needs so much to not just flourish, but also to survive in the hostile environments imposed by too many overwhelming aspects of the current times. The easiest way for authoritarian leaders to retain their power is to point to an outside enemy, and there is no more of an obvious enemy than Israel and the West to blame for their misery, rather than the actual incompetence of their rulers. The Debate continues as Aaron Meltzer takes on the issue of the cartoon creators' freedom of speech, the threats to their persons, and he looks at why we have animosity between Islam and Judaism and Christianity in the "South Park Shot At" follow up: On the surface this issue appears simple. Clearly nobody should be threatened with murder, or for that matter, actually murdered, for something they said or created. More and more Radical Islamists who kill and threaten to kill appear at best misguided and malicious, and at worst insane. However, one fact we should keep in mind is that angry Muslims are just as rational as we are. So then the issue goes from being about whether a person has the freedom to express what they want to why what would otherwise be a small offense causes Muslims in the Middle East to erupt with violent rage. So why does it? That question is complicated. The origins can be traced back to the Middle Ages, but the most important events happened after World War I. All three Abrahamic religions promise their adherents that they are better than everyone else, in one form or another. The Old Testament refers to Jews as the chosen people, the New Testament states that only Christians will go to heaven, and Islam offers a destiny similar to the Christian one. This sense of being special conflicted terribly with the reality and humiliation of Colonialism, just like it did with any other colonized group. The humiliation of Colonialism is key and cannot be understated in understanding how Arabs view the West currently. This, combined with the creation of Israel, completes in many Muslim Arabs’ view of the West eternally humiliating and occupying their lands. This, of course, does not give them a license to kill. The reality is that the West no longer has any interest in colonizing or otherwise humiliating Muslims. Likewise, the state of Israel was created because of the historical claims that Jews also have to the Holy Land, in addition of the Palestinians, and because of the two millenniums of persecution Jews faced in Europe. Instead, the main reason this recent history fans the flames of hatred for the West is mostly because the Arab leaders themselves have been doing the fanning. The easiest way for authoritarian leaders to retain power is to point to an outside enemy, and there is no more obvious an enemy than Israel and the West to blame for their misery, rather than the actual incompetence of their rulers. This, combined with the near universal religion of Islam in the Middle East, allows rulers to concentrate the entire societies energies towards an outside enemy and creates a sense of connection between the people in the different Arab, and in some cases, Persian, states. In turn, Muslims in Europe and, although to a much lesser extent, the United States, sometimes find it difficult to assimilate in the West, creating the problem of violent Radical Islamists who grew up in the West. However that is a whole new topic for another time. So in that sense, when Arabs riot violently in the streets and Muslims in the West protest, and a very small minority commit murder, because of a simple cartoon, while there are genocides occurring against Muslims, like in Sudan, that are being ignored, they are not really rioting against the cartoon, but against the perceived injustice the West has been perpetuating for a little over a hundred years that has been fanned by incompetent Authoritarian leaders. As a side note, I realized that in many cases in this piece I used the word Muslims and Arabs interchangeably. This is unintentional, when I use the word Muslims I am referring to the wider world of Islam, while when I use the word Arabs I am only referring to Arabs. This is important because violent riots and post- World War I colonialism only happened in the Arab world, but Muslims in the rest of the world may feel sympathy and adopt these feelings, especially Muslims in the West. - by Aaron Meltzer South Park Shot At 08/09/2010
Eerie Flashbacks of Slain Filmmaker Theo Van Gogh: Freedom of Speech Results in American-Muslim Threatening “South Park” Creators As James Vicini reports in his article (Reuters) “Man behind ‘South Park’ threat arrested,” the television writers/creators Trey Stone and Matt Parker were threatened for their use of the Islamic prophet Mohammad. During a recent episode, a largely invisible parody of Mohammad finally appeared on the screen wearing a bear suit and a large smile. Unlike many religions’ celebrity usage of their holy men (women are largely absent), like Jesus Christ Superstar, many of the Muslim community often find any depiction, or negative connotation, of Mohammad to be offensive. Though it would be difficult to find any negative connotation in the “South Park” showing of the man, he was clearly depicted (though largely covered) in the American TV cartoon/comedy. Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gogh met similar backlash (as he attempted to represent violence toward women in some Islamic sects) for his film, “Submission,” in which he depicted a Muslim wife who was beaten by a violent husband. For his ten-minute movie, a Muslim murdered him in 2004, in Amsterdam. Twenty-year-old US citizen Zachary Chesser was arrested for attempting to fly to Somalia to join an al Quaeda terrorist faction; he had recently made Internet postings warning the "South Park" creators that they would die like Van Gogh. The madness has not abated. Instead it has grown. The apathetic and quiet middle ground followers of organized religions (such as but not limited to Catholicism, Islam, Judaism, Christianity) have lost tremendous ground to the ignorant, outspoken and too often convincing extremists who have the high and the low ends and are pinching down upon all of the others. Each faith argues that they alone are the right one. Each faith despises and often outwardly lashes out at non-believers, infidels and rationalists. As Bill Maher points out in his film, “Religulous,” it should not be difficult to ensure a person’s freedom of speech by saying that no one should have to die or be threatened because of something they wrote. People write horrendously stupid things every second of every day, but some can get away with this, some get paid for this (Glenn Beck) and some get threatened or killed for…what? Killed for what? A point of view? A thought? A parody? An inside look into…religion’s good, bad and ugly? Even a disrespectful writer should not die for saying what they believe, or saying what is on their mind, or saying just how silly a bear suit makes the world. - by R.J. Huneke Amiri: Turncoat to Triple Agent? * Updated Debate: Adds Espionage and Iran's Bomb Capacity * 07/14/2010
* Updated Debate * Before Tuesday, the US had refused to admit that the missing Iranian nuclear scientist, Shahram Amiri, had ever been present in the United States. The NY Times wrote in detail on this here. On Wednesday he was headed back to Tehran after being missing for over a year. Amiri claims that the CIA had kidnapped him, while on a religious holiday in Saudi Arabia, and that they were attempting to force him to speak out against Iran’s nuclear program. The US claims he defected of his own accord and that his return to Tehran was due to his family being threatened in his homeland. The media in Iran is quick to condemn the US as hostile kidnappers, and the CIA is currently quiet as stories circulate of Amiri being recruited to provide nuclear program details, and that this only fell apart after news of threats to the scientist’s family had reached him. Who is lying? Perhaps everyone is avoiding the truth here. Could this nuclear scientist, of a US rival nation, have abandoned his birth land and given himself over to the capitalism that could permanently better his immediate life and that of his family? Did the man truly fall victim to CIA abductors and a year of torturous imprisonment without squealing on Iran? Maybe, in a La Carre-like scenario the US has released this man, on the premise that he was kidnapped unwillingly, so that he could return to Tehran and still retain the trust of his own people as he worked as a US turned Triple Agent. Philosophically, who has the truer goal here regarding Amiri? Should Amiri betray his own people for the betterment of a hostile-free nuclear world, or should he refuse the US at every point and remain loyal to the western country’s advesary? What would any of us do if the CIA offered us a choice (which Amiri claims he never had)? * Above by R.J. Huneke * Argument is taken up by Aaron Meltzer Below * The individual Iranian scientist is relatively unimportant. It is interesting from the point of view of espionage, but all it shows is something we knew all along: that the United States and Israel are waging a war of espionage against Iran's attempt to build an atomic bomb. In the broader picture, it appears to have worked in slowing down Iran as numerous reports have stated that form the data we have gathered about the Iranian effort, the centrifuges and such have not been working at full capacity. Furthermore, a while ago, I believe in President Bush's term, the Israelis stated that the Iranians were six months away from building a bomb. The fact that it has been over six months means either the Israelis were wrong, or that the Iranians have been slowed down, as has been suggested recently. However, all espionage can do is slow the Iranians down. Without some sort of internal collapse or a military strike, it looks like Iran will build an atomic bomb. Given the strikes and protests at the bazaars, a key part of the Iranian economy, it looks like some sort of toppling of the Iranian regime is possible given its current course. However the problem is which one occurs first, and if Iran does build an atomic bomb and then collapses, we have no way to be sure that bomb is kept out of the hands of those who would use it for terrorism. That said, that scenario depends on a lot of if's, so it is no use thinking about such a scenario for now. The Clash On Your Rights - Warming Up 07/11/2010
The week's W2P current event decoding will begin shortly. Until that time it is important to note the importance of your rights and especially the right of freedom of speech in the US and the world. Enjoy the breakdown of the Clash classic "Know Your Rights": This is a public service announcement With guitar Know your rights all three of them Number 1 You have the right not to be killed Murder is a CRIME! Unless it was done by a Policeman or aristocrat Know your rights And Number 2 You have the right to food money Providing of course you Don't mind a little Investigation, humiliation And if you cross your fingers Rehabilitation Know your rights These are your rights Wang Know these rights Number 3 You have the right to free Speech as long as you're not Dumb enough to actually try it. Know your rights These are your rights All three of 'em It has been suggested In some quarters that this is not enough! Well.............................. Get off the streets Get off the streets Run You don't have a home to go to Smush Finally then I will read you your rights You have the right to remain silent You are warned that anything you say Can and will be taken down And used as evidence against you Listen to this Run First W2P Post! 07/07/2010
Just what is the World to the Philosoph? BP tries another cap to stymie the oil atrocity, Russian spies are being traded with the US in Cold War/James Bond-like ways and war rages on in Afghanistan because the US agenda there is to...well, the point is that complex social, political and environmental issues are making headlines every week. W2P is going to attempt to look at current events in a different way. The World to Philosoph is a unique point of view, because regardless of political affiliation or bias the Philosoph looks at every issue from all perspectives and uses empathy and critical thinking to try and decipher just what is actually going on in the world at large and why. Tune in every week, and please voice your own opinion here if you are feeling engaged by the W2P material... |

RSS Feed